Hi guys,
I though it would be easier to see the full picture of we've come up with so far, so I went ahead and aggregated all the items and suggestions in one post. Maybe this will help you come up with new ideas.
ITEMS
- that can be started with "I believe/I am confident that..." stem
- I think I can get people to want to work together to solve a problem we think is important.
- I am confident that I can clearly and effectively communicate my thoughts and ideas to other members of our group so that they can understand me.
- I believe that all members of our group are competent in the group roles assigned to them.
- I am confident that our group members value different points of view and disagreements as a way to construct a joint understanding of the problem.
- I think that all members of our group can follow the established and agreed on ground norms.
- I am confident that our group can set specific goals, and plan and coordinate individual and joint actions to sucsessfully achieve these goals
(I beleive I/our group can)
7. Agree to decisions that require giving up personal interest
8. Resolve conflicts when members feel they are not being treated fairly
9. Prevent disagreements from turning into heated arguments
10. Get members to share responsibilities
11. Support each other in times of stress
12. Bounce back quickly from adverse experiences
13. Help each other to achieve their personal goals (not sure if it is consistent with group work) 14. Build respect for each other's particular interests
15. Help each other with work demands
16. Get members to carry out their responsibilities when they neglect them (very close to item 4) 17. Celebrate group traditions even in difficult times (not sure if it fits)
18. Serve as a good example for the community (not sure if it fits)
19. Remain confident during difficult times (not sure in phrasing)
20. Accept each member's need for independence.
- with barrier phrasing
21. When there is disagreement or conflict
22. When there is a misunderstanding
23. When there is uncertainty
24. When there are power struggles in relationships
I suggest that you think about the following dimensions of collective efficacy measured by the scale, particularly:
[1] I vs. we component [for example, items 1-2, 15-18 are clearly about the "I" in the group and how "I" can contribute to the success of my group; other items are either about the "we" component or can be attributed to both categories]
[2] at least 3 dimensions of collective efficacy:
a) Communicative/social (effectively managing conflicts, your own emotions, and establishing positive relationships with others)
b) Emotional (effectively managing emotions, e. g., forget quickly about adversive experiences) [
c) Task-related (effectively organizing work process to solve a problem)
They can help us differentiate among different items and create subscales. Below is the table of our items categorized by this principle.
Communicative/social
|
Emotional
|
Task-related
|
1.
I think I can get people to want to work together to solve a problem we think
is important.
2.
I am confident that I can clearly and effectively communicate my thoughts and
ideas to other members of our group so that they can understand me.
4.
I am confident that our group members value different points of view and
disagreements as a way to construct a joint understanding of the problem.
5.
I think that all members of our group can follow the established and agreed
on ground norms.
7. Agree to decisions that require
giving up personal interest
8. Resolve conflicts when members feel
they are not being treated fairly
11. Support each other in times of
stress
13. Help each other to achieve their personal
goals
14. Build
respect for each other's particular interests
16. Get members to carry out their
responsibilities when they neglect them (very
close to item 4)
17. Celebrate group traditions even in difficult
times (not sure if it fits)
18. Serve as a good example for the community (not
sure if it fits)
20. Accept
each member's need for independence.
22. When there is a misunderstanding
23. When there is uncertainty
24. When there are power struggles in
relationships
|
9. Prevent disagreements from turning
into heated arguments
11. Support each other in times of
stress
12. Bounce back quickly from adverse
experiences
19. Remain
confident during difficult times (not
sure in phrasing)
21. When there is disagreement or
conflict
|
3.
I believe that all members of our group are competent in the group roles
assigned to them.
6.
I am confident that our group can set specific goals, and plan and coordinate
individual and joint actions to successfully achieve these goals
7. Agree to decisions that require
giving up personal interest
10. Get members to share
responsibilities
15. Help each other with work
demands
16. Get members to carry out their
responsibilities when they neglect them (very
close to item 4)
|
MEASUREMENT
1. Number of points
Mark proposed a great idea of using a 1 to 6 Likert scale without the "neutral" option which would look like this:
1 = not confident at all,
2 = not confident,
3 = somewhat not confident,
4 = somewhat confident,
5 = confident,
6 = highly confident.
Anna raised the question of whether we should provide a neutral option at all (and use 7-point scale as a consequence). This is an important question and I'd like to know everybody's opinion. I don't think we need to use "neutral" or "don't know" because we always estimate out efficacy somehow. What do you think, guys?
2. Reversed items
Another thought of mine on that. I found two articles (article 1, article 2) about the ineffectiveness of reversed items. I personally think that reversed items can sometimes be confusing or overwhelming and don't want to use it in our scale. But maybe you can provide arguments proving me wrong?
This is really good Irina, although there are a number of thorny issues to deal with going forward. I have been thinking about perhaps adding a fourth category. As I mentioned last class I have been struggling with the concept of collaborate. The use of collaborate is far too wide. Sometimes you don't want people to continue collaborating if any of them believe they are doing the wrong thing or doing something that is ultimately detrimental or even useless. You don't want people to go along just because they think it is their obligation to work together. I think that collective efficacy can and should move beyond this general idea. I think this is one of the points Ralph Sampson was trying to make. So collective efficacy should include a healthy dollop of agency in a way that straddles the line between self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Something like "I believe I can get members of the group to listen to me when I think we are going in the wrong direction." and "I believe the group is ready to listen to any person who might be willing to offer a new idea" and "I believe I can get the group to change direction if I have a good enough argument about why we are doing in the wrong direction."
ReplyDeleteMichael,
DeleteSo what you want to do is to create a fourth category related to agency? Or did I get it wrong? I understand the direction of your thinkin, but I fin it hard to really understand what you mean. Perhaps, you can talk more about it on Wednesday?
Wow, this is great Ira! I am wondering if maybe it would be easier for us to work off of a Google Doc instead of this blog? That way, we could all edit the same items at the same time, and it would be easier to keep track of all of our suggestions and changes.
ReplyDelete